SURVEY SAYS: SUSTAINABILITY BENEFITS ARE ON THE RISE!

Written by admin on February 22nd, 2011

The results of a recent study commissioned by KPMG International, reveals that many companies are beginning to embrace a variety of sustainability strategies now and for the future.  The early results from this study of 378 large and medium sized companies in 61 countries, reveals that 62% of these companies already have an “active’ sustainability program in place.

The study which was carried out by the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) reveals a clear increase in the number of companies with active sustainability programs over a 2008 report which indicated that just over half of the respondents at that time had a sustainability strategy in place.

The survey results indicated that sustainability benefits clearly outweighed any perceived drawbacks.  This comment was strongly endorsed by larger companies with annual revenues over $5 Billion.  So it is clear that the “big boys” are into sustainability for the long term, a fact that we have been echoing for a quite some time now.  Some of those benefits included significant reductions in energy costs, improved relationships with customers and suppliers, and more efficient use of resources, especially water.

Some companies even reported stimulated innovation within their companies, leading to new product lines and the opening of new markets.  One respondent with a long-running sustainability program reported a payback of between $1.50 and $2.00 for every dollar spent.  Where can a company get an investment like that these days?  So what is your company waiting for?  Jump on the “Green” bandwagon NOW!

 

NEW HOMELAND AIR SECURITY RULES ON THE HORIZON

Written by admin on February 22nd, 2011

The Department of Homeland Security is raising the bar for airline security in the wake of recent reports of plastic explosives onboard aircrafts entering the US.  DHS says it will issue new rules requiring airlines that carry cargo into the US to transmit shipping manifests PRIOR to departure of aircraft from foreign airports.

DHS has acknowledged that the data it now receives when the aircraft is already in the air is totally useless towards thwarting a mid-air attack.  We have to question DHS’ initial rules.  Didn’t anyone think this through?   Didn’t anyone see this coming?  We suspect not!

But let’s not simplify the matter too much as there are many issues to be resolved going forward.  These complex issues include, but are not limited to the following:

  • What data will DHS require and how will the airlines gather and report it?
  • How early in the loading process will this information be available?
  • Who has the data and can they be trusted to report the “real” facts?
  • How will DHS notify the originating carrier not to load the shipment?
  • How can DHS work with foreign countries to seek out and stop the “bad guys”?

We are sure that more issues will arise that have not yet been thought about.  The terrorists are devoting a great deal of time, effort and resources to “beat” the system.  We are going to have to do everything in our power to stay one step ahead of them.  Let’s hope we can.

 

UPS REALLY DOES LOVE LOGISTICS

Written by admin on February 2nd, 2011

Today we saw the fruits of what UPS loves about logistics.  That’s because they reported record 4th quarter earnings which surged a whopping 44% over the 4th quarter of 2009.  In fact they are projecting that their Earnings Per Share for 2011 will jump 16 to 22%.  In addition they reported their global revenue increased by 8.4%, generating $1.8 Billion in adjusted operating profit which represents a 40% increase over last year.

In 2010 the company delivered a staggering 3.9 billion packages which averages out to be 15.6 million packages per day.  Their revenue increased 9.4% to $49.5 Billion and their adjusted operating profit increased to $5.8 Billion.   UPS really is a cash cow, and remembers these numbers do not even factor in the General Rate Increase that went into effect on January 3rd, 2011.

Which by the way leads us to wonder…..did they really need to publish such a large general rate increase for 2011?  It has always been a pet peeve of ours that the transportation industry implements a general rate increase each and every year without ever really justifying such increases.  Do you think UPS knew where their profits would fall when they announced the increases in late 2010?  You bet they did.

So we have a question for all those customers who utilize the services of UPS or any freight carrier for that matter, have you increased your rates to your customers each year for the past 30 years by an average of 6-7% a year?  We didn’t think so.  Which leads us to another question, don’t you think its time to make sure that your company is not overly contributing to these huge carrier profits?  There is a simple solution.  Have your rates and contracts analyzed and benchmarked by a Third Party Parcel Consultant who can tell you precisely if you are overpaying and by how much.   All it takes to get started is a short telephone conversation for a No COST, NO OBLIGATION benchmark analysis.

 

HERE COME THE FEDS! DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE NOW INVESTIGATING UPS AND FEDEX

Written by admin on January 25th, 2011

As we have been reporting over the past several months, UPS and FedEx have both made a business decision not to allow their customers to engage Third Party Consultants in parcel carrier contract negotiations.  This is quite interesting since the utilization of Third Party Consultants for pricing negotiations, for all modes of transportation has been growing steadily over the past decade or so.  It is even more interesting when you count the fact that UPS Freight and FedEx Freight, (the parcel Giants’ general freight operations), not only work closely with Third Party Consultants in truck pricing and contract negotiations, but welcome them as a valued resource for new business opportunities.  They don’t seem to have a problem with the Third Party Consultants in trucking negotiations.  Is it because they benefit greatly from these relationships?  Shippers have relied heavily on Third Party Consultants for years to help them better manage their transportation and logistics expenses, and we expect that trend to grow in the future.

As we have also reported, one of the industry’s leading Third Party Parcel Negotiators, AFMS filed a lawsuit against both FedEx and UPS several months ago seeking in part, treble damages because the suit claims the decision by FedEx and UPS not only violates Antitrust Laws, but they also believe collusion is involved.  That’s because this policy was announced by the duopoly of UPS and FedEx and implemented right around the same time.

Well apparently the furor over these policies of the nations leading parcel carriers has now garnered the attention of the Department of Justice.  DOJ recently contacted both UPS and FedEx to advise them that they are in fact looking into these allegations.

According to a UPS spokesperson, the lawsuit is “trying to punish UPS for working directly with its customers”, noting how hilarious it is that one allegation could be considered collusion.  “It’s pretty evident that we strongly compete”, the UPS spokesperson went on to say.  The spokesperson for FedEx, Maury Lane simply stated they have in fact been notified of the DOJ’s investigation and that they fully intend to cooperate.  And the Justice Department for their part, as expected has declined comment.

In a recent CNBC report, Herb Greenberg stated that the DOJ “probe is part of a broader, more interesting story about how FedEx and UPS may be attempting to recoup profits lost by shippers using consultants to save money”.  In fact, according to the lawsuit filed by AFMS, between 2007 and 2009 its customers alone saved over $100 Million when their contracts were renegotiated by AFMS on behalf of their customers.  “The use of consultant-generated discounts has reinvigorated price competition between UPS and FedEx” the AFMS lawsuit stated.  The success of AFMS’ negotiations, as well as negotiations handled by dozens of other Third Party Parcel Negotiators over the years has in fact impacted both UPS and FedEx’s bottom lines.  So, is it now time for a payback?

What’s also interesting is that the comment made by UPS attempts to downplay the fact that so far there is only ”one” allegation of collusion and that came from the AFMS lawsuit.  DOJ may think otherwise and there may very well be merit to these and other allegations, and that is precisely why DOJ is now investigating this situation.

The stark reality is that shippers that utilize the services of UPS and FedEx may be negatively affected financially by these recent actions.  Shippers should be allowed to hire any consultant they wish to help them better manage their business.  This includes the ability to have their parcel contracts benchmarked by industry experts and to re-negotiate their contracts to improve their pricing and service, only if they are entitled to such reductions.  But the problem for most shippers is they have no way of knowing if they are entitled to lower rates unless they do engage a Third Party Negotiator.

While UPS and FedEx attempt to maintain a firm stance on this issue, a very interesting fact is now surfacing.  And that fact is that UPS and FedEx may allow shippers to utilize the services of Third Party Negotiators when it is in UPS and FedEx’s best interest.  The bottom line is that if a shipper objects to this stance and tells FedEx and/or UPS they want to work with a third party, the parcel carriers will usually agree.  This new business strategy therefore might appear to be a bullying tactic from both UPS and FedEx and one that may be easily reversed when contested, or certainly when it meets the parcel giants’ needs.  At the very least it may be discriminatory against smaller parcel shippers that may not have the volume clout or expertise to challenge UPS and FedEx’s stand.

To prove this point, here is a snapshot of both UPS and FedEx’s internal policy on the matter.

FedEx Policy: The district sales manager is instructed to appeal to a director or VP level employee if he/she feels that not working with the consultant will damage the customer relationship, or if the Third Party Consultant provides an opportunity to win an entrenched competitor customer.  Another confidential source at FedEx said the policy is “posturing” and that FedEx will back down if shippers call its bluff.  The source went on to say, “We simply cannot afford to walk away from business”.

UPS’ Policy: UPS’ policy is to negotiate directly with its customers and not Third Party Consultants.  However, the policy can be appealed at the discretion of the sales team with approval of the director of sales.  In these cases, UPS will require a signed Third Party Confidentiality Agreement between UPS, the shipper and the Third Party Negotiator.   This too is interesting since this confidentiality agreement has been required by UPS for years when the Third Party Negotiators are involved in the negotiation process.  So what’s changed?  If the Third Party Confidentiality Agreement worked in the past, why doesn’t it work now?

We find it hard to believe that we have not seen more shippers voicing their opinions on this matter.  It is quite possible, however that many have in fact been voicing their opinion and perhaps directly to the Department of Justice.  We would not be surprised to see some Class Action lawsuits popping up in the near future by various shipper groups as these investigations continue.  Shippers just can’t allow these actions to continue without taking a stand.  The biggest obstacle however is that many smaller shippers are not even aware that UPS and FedEx have taken this stance.

Many Third Party Negotiators continue to provide their clients with consultative services to gain the same bottom line results for their shipper customers, while at the same time by-passing any UPS and/or FedEx self serving scrutiny.  As their client’s internal pricing and contract experts, they lead and advise their clients throughout the Bid Process starting with Pre-Contract Savings Analysis; Bid Preparation with Precise Price Targets; Contract Benchmarking; Negotiation Strategy; and Carrier Bid Comparisons.  The bottom line for all parcel shippers is annual savings ranging from 15-25% and oftentimes more, of their annual parcel spend.  For this reason, many CPA firms and business consultants continually recommend these Third Party Negotiators to their clients.  For further information, please contact Tony Nuzio at 516-822-1183, ext. 312 or tnuzio@icclogistics.com.

 

GOOD NEWS/BAD NEWS: POSTAGE RATES ON THE RISE, AGAIN

Written by admin on January 25th, 2011

The good news is that the postal service has not taken an increase in almost two years, (gee, it seems like yesterday).  The bad news is that the rates are going up on April 11, 2011.  Want some more good news?  The increased rates, which will affect First Class Mail, Standard Mail, Periodicals, Package Services and Extra Services, will ONLY be increased by 1.741%.  This is because the increase is based on a price cap calculated by the Postal Rate Committee using Consumer Price Index data.

The Postal Service seems to be battling a consistent uphill climb attempting to make itself “profitable”.  Many folks continue to push for privatization of the Post Office operations.  Might that be an option?  Also, the USPS will be taking some big steps in the near future as it looks to become a player in the $100+ Billion dollar small parcel business.  It already partners with UPS and FedEx in “Last Mile” deliveries for certain UPS and FedEx service offerings.

If you would like to view the new increased rates by shipment type, you can do so on line at Postal Explorer at pe.usps.com.

 

SOME MORE GOOD NEWS: CONTAINER SHIP OVERCAPACITY WILL KEEP OCEAN RATES LOW, FOR NOW

Written by admin on January 25th, 2011

According to industry analysts’ forecasts, ocean carriers will face overcapacity for at least another 12 months as the supply of new and larger ships outpaces slower cargo demand.  The expectation is for the global container fleets to expand at an annual rate of only 8.7% over the next two years with 1.2 Million 20 foot equivalent units due to be delivered in 2011 and an additional 1.33 million TEU’s expected in 2012.

On the other side of the coin is the prediction that cargo demand is expected to slow significantly to below 8% in 2011 compared to an estimate of 13.6% in 2010, (the final numbers still have not been calculated).  The downward demand in the fourth Quarter of 2010 has already started to erode ocean carriers’ load factors.  One of the offsetting factors to these potential lower rates will obviously be the continuing increase in fuel costs which are always passed on to the shippers.  We do not believe however that the increase in fuel will have any major impact on increasing rates in the ocean shipping arena.

It will be interesting to see how much pressure President Obama put on the Chinese Government during their recent meetings here in the US.  There is a great need for the US to seek increased exports to China and the US needs to apply as much pressure as it can on the Chinese Government.   The US must strongly voice its displeasure with many of the anti-US Trade regulations now imposed by the Chinese Government.  Don’t hold your breath, however!

 

WORKING ON THE RAILROAD: RAILROAD CARLOAD AND INTERMODAL VOLUME UP IN 2010

Written by admin on January 25th, 2011

The Association of American Railroads recently reported that carload and intermodal shipping volume increased in 2010 over 2009 levels however the increase did not bring volumes up to the pre-recession totals.  Some more good news, bad news!

“Like the economy in general, rail traffic in 2010 recovered some lost ground, but not nearly all of it,” reported AAR Senior VP, John T. Gray.  “That being said, monthly rail traffic increases were broad based, supporting the idea that economic recovery likewise is broad based.”  Here are some highlights from the AAR report:

  • Total Carload Volume was 14, 820,128, up 7.3% over 2009 levels
  • Intermodal volume was 11,282,336, up 14.2% over 2009 levels
  • Increases were the largest since the initial record keeping in 1998, however increases were the second lowest on record after 2009
  • Increase was equivalent to roughly 20,000 additional trains in 2010 over 2009
  • Coal shipments represented 45.4% of the carload traffic, up 1.2% over 2009 levels
 

Freight Rate Increases – When is Enough Enough?

Written by admin on January 13th, 2011

As we close out 2010, most freight carriers have already implemented their General Rate Increases for the coming year.  Depending on how the economy goes, or doesn’t go in 2011, don’t be surprised if we see another round of increases later on in 2011.

So as these increases take a larger slice out of corporate profits, companies must continually analyze the freight cost relationship to their cost of sales.  The problem is that many companies don’t even realize their rates have been increased so how can they possibly analyze the impact to their business?  That is a question that every corporate finance executive needs to find the answer to and find it as soon as possible.

In addition to the impact of these General Rate Increases, there is the added cost of rising fuel surcharges.  Every carrier charges its customers a Fuel Surcharge in addition to its base charges which escalates with the increase in the cost of fuel the transportation service provider utilizes.  This is true for motor carriers, parcel carriers, as well as air and ocean carriers.  With projections of oil prices inching up to the $100 per barrel mark again, shippers will be hard pressed to control these rising freight prices without taking some serious steps to control costs NOW!

So what is the answer?  Shippers need to question all of their transportation service providers and request Cost Justification for any of these increases.  Once the carriers know that the shipper is taking a true interest in cost justification, the shipper usually receives some financial assistance in the way of reduced price increases.  Sometimes it’s just a matter of asking.  Here are some other areas companies should be questioning to stay ahead of the curve.

Assess the Level of Business Tendered to the Freight Carrier: The level of business tendered to a freight carrier may affect its costing either positively or negatively.  If the carrier considers the business profitable, the more business you give the carrier the better chance you have to get the prices reduced.  On the other hand if the business is unprofitable, giving the carrier more business will have a negative impact on shipping costs.

Ask the Carriers for its Costing Information: That’s right, let the carrier show you their internal costing data to justify the increases they are seeking.  Based on the costing data the carrier provides, does that carrier really need the increases it is seeking?  What factors have actually increased their costs?

Determine Where the Carrier’s Costs Have Risen: Once the carrier points to the factors requiring a rate increase, perhaps the shipper can help the carrier reduce its costs so the carrier can eliminate the need for the increase.  Most shippers NEVER address this issue with their freight carriers and yet they believe they have a true partnership.

What is the Competition Charging? Shippers should constantly be aware of what competitive pricing alternatives are available.  Shippers that fail to understand the competitive market place will have their hands tied behind their back when trying to get the carriers to limit these increases.  Shippers should look to firms that provide Benchmarking Analysis Services to document the best available rates.  These firms have all of the data and metrics to help any company reduce its freight cost significantly.

Competition is still fierce in every segment of the transportation industry.  If you’re not sure you have the best available rates we urge you to contact us at 516 822-1183, ext. 312 or tony@icclogistics.com and let us show you how you can immediately improve your bottom line!

 

UPS & FEDEX 2011 GENERAL RATE INCREASE

Written by admin on December 20th, 2010

Dear friends:

It’s that time of year again!  Last month we told you about UPS’ General Rate Increases.  Now, it’s FedEx’s turn!  FedEx announced this month their Ground service rates would increase by 5.9% with a 1% reduction in the fuel surcharge and their Air Express and US Export rates would increase by 6.9% with a 2% reduction in the fuel surcharge, also to become effective on January 3rd, 2011.  What does this mean for you and your business?  Things aren’t always what they seem…

That’s why this year again, we have asked Jack Mitchell, president of Parcel Appraisal and Negotiations Consulting Group, and our strategic business partner to provide us with his very comprehensive analysis of the “actual” increases these carriers will be implementing in just a few short weeks.  As you can see by the detailed charts below, Jack has analyzed the rate increases for various service levels and shipment weights so you will see that while some increases fall below the average, many increases will be well above the average.   These charts will enable you to track how these increases will affect your own business starting in January.

To take this one step further, while General Rate Increases are usually implemented only once a year, when you compound these annual increases over several years, the increases are actually much higher than originally calculated.  For example, three consecutive years of a 5.9% increase might be calculated as a 17.7% increase however, the actual increase is 18.7%.

Had enough bad news?  Well, here’s some good news for you!!!  The real key for all shippers to realize is that they do not have to just sit back and accept these General Rate Increases proposed by the major parcel carriers, or any freight carrier for that matter.  The best way to stay ahead of these increases is to have a Benchmark Analysis performed to analyze current rates and see how they stack up compared to the competition and other similarly situated shippers.  The results of these Benchmark Analyses have resulted in Millions of Dollars in annual savings for those companies who had their rates benchmarked and then took steps to re-negotiate their contracts to meet constantly changing competitive freight rate structures.

Want to know how your rates stack up and whether you have an opportunity for significant cost savings for your company?  Contact Tony Nuzio at 516 822-1183, ext. 312 or via email at tnuzio@icclogistics.com.  We look forward to hearing from you and helping you find significant cost savings for your company!  Please enjoy Jack’s comprehensive analysis below.  Wishing all our readers a very Happy, but more importantly Healthy New Year!

UPS & FedEx 2011 General Rate Increase

UPS & FedEx overall rate increase takes effect on January 3, 2011. The increase will touch every service and increase a majority of accessorial fees and surcharges. The PANC Group, like those of you who are responsible for shipping, is faced with determining the impact of the rate increase for its customers. We hope our analysis helps lessen the impact of shipping expenses on your company and clients.

Carrier Announced Rate Increase

  • UPS Air & International net increase 4.9%. – Increase 6.9% with a 2% reduction in fuel surcharge.
  • UPS Ground commercial net increase 4.9% – Increase 5.9% with a 1% reduction in fuel surcharge.
  • FedEx Air & International net increase 3.9% – Increase 6.9% with a 2% reduction in fuel surcharge.
  • FedEx Ground commercial net increase 4.9% – Increase 5.9% with a 1% reduction in fuel surcharge.
  • New Dim Divisor will increase rates considerably for both domestic and international shipments.

General synopsis of rate and accessorial fees increases

The carrier’s have now published the 2011 air and ground rate charts, accessorial fees, surcharges, new package minimums, and a costly new method to price single and multiple piece shipments subject to dimensionalization. The annual increase was announced as a flat percentage and as a rule is thought of in linear terms. The reality is that nothing could be further from the truth. The 4.9% percent increase in fact is not linear at all. Much to the contrary, it is based on the mean average. (“The mean is what most people mean when they say ‘average’. It is found by adding all the numbers you have to find the mean of, and dividing by the number of numbers. So the mean of 3%, 5%, 7%, 3% and 5% is 23/5 = 4.6%.

This year’s ground increase was introduced as a 4.9% increase, yet as you can see from the chart below, the mean average for shipment 1 to 5 pounds is actually a 7.72% increase. By contrast the mean average for shipments weighing 100 pounds is 2%. The actual increase is different for each customer and a direct reflection of their shipping characteristics. Each shipper will pay more or less based on actual package weights, distances traveled, service requested, actual delivery area, residential or commercial deliveries, and a host of other items outlined later in our analysis.

Ground Rates

Ground rates, as you can see in the above comparisons of the 2010 rates versus the 2011 rates, have increased quite a bit more in the lower weight ranges and shorter zones. Take a quick look at the 2, 3, 4, and 5 pound rates predominantly in zones 2, 3, 4, and 5. The increases climb from 7.8% upward to a high of 8.8%. It’s not just a coincidence that those weights and zones, in particular, are some of the very heaviest areas of business concentration for carriers and shippers. The average increase for ground rates from one to ten pounds is approximately 7.44%.

Ground Minimum

The Ground Minimum increased by $0.33 cents per shipment, or a 6.8% increase, much higher than the 4.9% announced. The minimum, as you might know, is the lowest possible price to ship a one pound package using the ground service. The chart below shows how rapidly the ground minimum has been increased in just a few short years. Retailers shipping ground packages to residences will see a hike of $0.25 cents per shipment. That is an 11.3% increase in the residential surcharge applied even prior to a fuel surcharge being added.

Minimum Plus Residential Increases 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007
Zone 2, 1 LBS Ground $5.17 $4.84 $4.57 $4.20 $4.00
Residential Surcharge $2.45 $2.20 $2.05 $1.95 $1.85
Cost before fuel added $7.62 $7.04 $6.62 $6.15 $5.85

A New Dimensional Weight Factor is one of the largest cost items being implemented is receiving far too little attention based on its impact. Customers familiar with dimensionalization rules should evaluate the new Dim Divisor immediately to determine its effect on shipping costs. The new rules will increase rates substantially for shipments that already dim. The dim of a package is figured by multiplying the length of a package, (X times) the width of a package, (X times) the height of a package and divided by a dominator or dim divisor.

New Dim Divisor

  • The domestic ground and air dim divisor currently 194 will change to 166.
  • Export services from the U.S. (all services) will change from 166 to 139.
  • UPS Standard to Canada will change from 166 to 139.
  • Import to the U.S. from Canada and Virgin Islands will change from 166 to 139.
  • The new dim applies to packages 3 cubic feet or larger in size.

Sample Dim Divisor: 194 to 166 – box size of 18 x 15 X 12 actual weight of 10 Lbs.

Dim Service Zone Actual Dim Cost
Current Dim 194 Ground 5 10 lbs. 17 lbs. $12.38
New Dim 166 Ground 5 10 lbs. 20 lbs. $14.15
Current Dim 194 2nd Day 5 10 lbs. 17 lbs. $48.45
New Dim 166 2nd Day 5 10 lbs. 20 lbs. $54.65

Air Services

UPS increase will be a net of 4.9% and that is 1% higher than their competitor, FedEx, at only 3.9%. Why would that happen two years in a row, you might ask? Simply because FedEx’s list rates, before applying any incentives or discounts, are 8% higher for priority, 6% higher for saver, 7% higher for 2 day and in the high teens for 3 day shipments. UPS is trying to reduce the rating differential for air services between them and FedEx. Ground rates and accessorial fees for both carriers’ are mostly identical. In order to figure the exact increase, shippers must thoroughly analyze their invoice data. Next, compare your current rates verses the new rates after discounts inclusive of accessorial fees and surcharges using your live shipping data.

FedEx Increase Averages 1 to 50 Pounds

Early AM increases up to 50 pounds will be approximately 4%

Next Day Air increases up to 50 pounds will be approximately 6.08%

Standard Air increases up to 50 pounds will be approximately 7.28%

Second Day increases up to 50 pounds will be approximately 5.78%

Express Saver increases up to 50 pounds will be approximately 7.73%

Accessorial Fees & Surcharges

These extra fees have now become about 25% of your overall carrier shipping costs. It is now vital that shippers fully understand the impact of all additional surcharges. As shipping expenses continue to increase they have more impact on profit and loss. As a result you must be certain that all fees are built into your price metrics. These fees rapidly increase your spend, but do nothing to improve pricing.

Address Correction increased to $11.00 from $10.00 an additional $1.00 per shipment or 10%

Additional Handling increased to $8.00 from $7.50 an additional $0.50 per package or 6.7%

COD Fees increased to $10.50 from $10.00 an additional $0.50 per package or 5%

DAS commercial increased to $1.85 from $1.70 an additional $0.15 per package or 8.9%

DAS extended commercial increased to $1.85 from $1.70 an additional $0.15 per package or 8.9%

DAS residential increased to $2.75 from $2.50 an additional $0.25 per package or 10%

DAS extended residential increased to $3.00 from $2.75 an additional $0.25 per package or 9%

DAS CWT assessed per package, with maximum fee up $9.25 from $8.50 an additional $0.75 or 8.8%

Declared value minimum increased to $2.25 from $2.10 an additional $0.15 per package or 7.1%

Declared value per $100 increased to $0.75 from $0.70 an additional $0.05 per package or 7%

Delivery intercept: increased to $14.00 from $11.00 by phone – with no increase if made by web.

Residential surcharge increased to $2.75 from $2.50 an additional $0.25 per package or 10%

Signature indirect increased to $2 per package from $1.75 an additional $0.25 per package or 14.2%

Direct signature required increased to $3.25 from $3.00 an additional $0.25 per package or 8.3%

Adult signature required increased to $4.25 from $4.00 an additional $0.25 per package or 6.2%

On call residential pickup increased to $2.45 from $2.20 per package an additional $.025 or 11.4%%

By Jack Mitchell President & CEO

 

WELL, IT’S NOW OFFICIAL… PARCEL RATES ARE ON THE RISE!

Written by admin on November 4th, 2010

UPS announced this week that higher rates for shippers will become effective on January 3, 2011.  While this is no surprise to anyone, some of the changes UPS will make in how they calculate rates and charges could have the impact of double digit increases for shippers.  As usual, we expect that FedEx will “mirror” these increases for their parcel shipping customers.

The “average” increase UPS is planning is 4.9% for Ground shipments as well as a 4.9% increase for Air Express and US origin international shipments.  To get to these “net” levels, UPS will increase the base Ground rates by 5.9%, but reduce the Fuel Surcharge percentage by 1%.  For the Air Express and International service products, UPS will increase the base rates by 6.9%, but reduce the Fuel Surcharge by 2%.  Bear in mind that the Fuel Surcharge is an Index Based Surcharge which fluctuates based on average fuel costs.  Therefore, UPS could increase the Fuel Surcharge percentages if and when the cost of fuel increases.

In the General Rate Increase announcement, UPS indicated they will be changing the factor methodology they use to calculate charges for Dimensional Weight packages.  For US domestic Air Services, the divisor UPS will use to calculate dimensional weight charges will change from 194 to 166.  For US Ground services, the divisor will also change from 194 to 166.

For export services from the US for all services the divisor will change from 166 to 139 and for UPS Standard Canada as well as imports to the US from Canada and the Virgin Islands, the divisor will also change from 166 to 139.

One thing is crystal clear, these changes in Dimensional Weight calculations will result in double digit increase for many shippers.  This is not something companies can just accept without fully understanding the impact it will have on the corporate bottom line.  We urge all shippers to analyze the impact of these changes with their UPS sales representative, or more importantly seek professional advice from Parcel Shipping Consultants who can clearly establish the impact these changes will have on its business.

In UPS’ letter to their customers announcing the General Rate Increase, UPS indicates that while the rates will be increasing, the value UPS provides to their shipper customers through “innovative products and logistics know how” will help their customers be “more competitive”.  It’s hard to imagine being “more competitive” however when your rates are increasing.

As we do every year, we have asked Jack Mitchell, President of Parcel Appraisal and Negotiations Consulting Group to provide a comprehensive analysis of both the UPS and the soon to be released FedEx General Rate Increases, so shippers will have a thorough understanding of the REAL impact of these increases.  We will issue Jack’s analysis as a “Special Report” and send it out to all of our subscribers just as soon as it is available.  You won’t want to be without this very vital information.